Film Room: Breaking down No. 9 Villanova's loss to No. 11 Creighton

Eric Francis

Today's lesson: defending the pick and roll, mismatches and strong side vs. weak side perimeter defense

We all saw what happened. It was bad. People cried. Doug McDermott lived. Villanova's defense was absolutely horrible, even worse than Creighton's.

Fun facts from readers:

From "Cats 111"

  • Creighton vs Nova - 2 games
  • FGs 67-111 (60%) 3s 30-50 (60%) FT 33-40 (82%)
  • Creighton Season Avgs. 49% - 42% - 75%
  • They have only shot 60% from the floor in one game ... against Villanova.
  • They have only shot 60% from three 3 times ... against Nova, Nova and Chicago State

From Coach "JimDribbles"

  • Jay was making adjustments from last game and coach McDermott knew what they would be and adapted his game plan. He knew we would be all over Wragge so he had his son isolated on the first three plays.
  • We panicked again in the first half we came down four times and without a pass shot the ball. The first two times down we got it inside and ochefu scored .
  • I never pick on refs but this is the type of game Jay needed to get mad and get a technical.
  • Creighton can make the final four they have it all
  • Pinkston needed the rock more in the first half.

Lastly for Villanova

  • Villanova started 22-3 during the 2009 and 2005 seasons (since 1996).
  • Prior to this game, Villanova played 49 Top 25 opponents in the last five seasons with a record of 22-27.
  • Villanova set season lows for blocks (one), rebounds (23), and steals (two).
  • The Wildcats have recorded more blocks than their opponents for the past four games.
  • The top two scorers (James Bell and JayVaughn Pinkston) accounted for 41.2 percent of the points.
  • The top two rebounders (Bell and Pinkston) accounted for 47.8 percent of the rebounds.
  • Bell has led the team in scoring 13 times and in rebounding 9 times in 25 games this season.
  • Pinkston has eight straight double-digit point games.
  • Bell has nine straight double-digit point games.
  • This was the fourth foul out of the season for Bell.

Lastly for Creighton:

  • McDermott accounted for 38.6 percent of the team's points.
  • The top two rebounders (McDermott and Avery Dingman) accounted for 50.0 percent of the rebounds.
  • The bench recorded more rebounds (12) than the starters (11).
  • McDermott has led the team in scoring 22 times and in rebounding 12 times in 25 games this season.
  • This marks the 77th 20-point game of Doug McDermott's career.
  • McDermott has five straight 20+ point games.

So for today's Film Room, I'll list the grades as I see them, but I'll be focusing more on the film itself instead of the overall grades. Just to put that out there ahead of time.

Note: Player's are graded on a scale of 1-10 and given a letter grade as follows...

Grade Rating
A+ 9.7 - 10
A 9.3 - 9.6
A- 9.0 - 9.2
B+ 8.7 - 8.9
B 8.3 - 8.6
B- 8.0 - 8.2
C+ 7.7 - 7.9
C 7.3 - 7.6
C- 7.0 - 7.2
D+ 6.7 - 6.9
D 6.5 - 6.6
F Below 6.5

----------------------------

JayVaughn Pinkston: Grade (B-/ 8.4/10)

+ : Force in the post in 2nd half, solid scoring, free throw shooting, good ball movement, aggressive around the rim

- : Average rebounding totals, foul trouble, not aggressive in the first half, poor defense

Daniel Ochefu: Grade (C+/ 7.8/10)

+ : Played his role as well as he could in 18 minutes on the floor, scored well

- : Foul trouble, horrible in defensive rotations, three of four fouls came on the perimeter

James Bell: Grade (B-/8.2/10)

+ : Scoring, efficient scoring, best team rebounder, perfect from the line

- : turnovers were a problem, was the worse defender on the floor out of the starting 5, fouled out again, caught in almost every screen possible, played bad defending ISO situations

Darrun Hilliard: Grade (C+/7.9/10)

+ : From watching tape, seemed to be the most defensively sound of any starter, rebounded averagely, scored averagely

- : foul trouble, wasn't aggressive enough from the floor coming off a strong game, got caught in too many screens on the strong side of the court.

Ryan Arcidiacono: Grade (C/7.6/10)

+ : Contributed to the ball movement of Villanova, wasn't in foul trouble this game, perfect at the line

- : didn't score well, inefficient from the field and three, not aggressive enough from the point position, didn't do much of anything in 31 minutes.

Kris Jenkins: Grade (B-/8.2/10)

+ : didn't stink up the joint, played his role well in 16 minutes, didn't foul when in, scored well for his role

- : got embarrassed on one play by McDermott in the low post, missed more shots than he made

Josh Hart: Grade (C+/7.7/10)

+ : a better game than what's previously been seen from Hart, solid rebounding in 17 minutes

- : missed all of his perimeter shots on bad looks, missed four of his six attempted shots

Tony Chennault: Grade (C-/7.0/10)

+ : He scored

- : 8 minutes, three fouls, two points, one turnover. Next.

Dylan Ennis: Grade (B-/8.4/10)

+ : For Ennis' role, he performed very well netting three deep shots and being the only source of energy from the bench.

- : Got abused defensively in the high post off the dribble, got caught in several screens, missed five shots of eight taken.

------------------------

Before we begin, this is how good Douggy McDirkmott was in the first half against No. 9 Villanova

Creighton11

Scary yet slightly amazing right? Alright with that done, first let's examine how bad the Wildcats were at defending the pick-and-roll on the strong side of the court and reverse weak side

-----------------

Defending the Pick and Roll

Creighton1

McDermott had a wide open lane to the basket by using a screen from Ethan Wragge on the strong side of the court to get Bell on his hip. After that, McDermott's quickness to the rim couldn't be stopped. A very good drawn up play by Coach McDermott due to how susceptible Villanova is to the pick-and-pop game.

It would seem that Creighton targeted Bell with these screens, or it could be the poor planning of Jay Wright to put Bell (6-6, 225) on McDermott (6-8, 230). It would have been better to put a lankier Hilliard on McDermott. The reasoning being that his wingspan (close to seven feet) would cut off McDermott's mobility and bother his shot more. Similar to how St. John's matched up with Creighton.

Example 2 of poor pick-and-roll defense:

Creighton2

Five Nova defenders guarding the perimeter for possible opportunities to shoot and face-guarding their opponents instead of watching the well-documented quickness of Austin Chatman and Devin Brooks.

Same play but reversed to the weak side and caught Bell on his hip again and it's another clear walk into the lane. Too easy. Very well designed.

Example 3 of poor pick-and-roll defense:

Creighton3

This time seemed like better planning by Coach McDermott than anything else. After seeing how well the pick-and-roll was the first two times in the game, this time he fakes the pick-and-roll with McDermott and Wragge and has Wragge do a "pick-and-fade."

Wragge didn't roll to the basket but instead faded to the strong side of the arc, a higher IQ play for a high-volume shooting team, putting a good shooter in the corners. However, this was used to expose a mismatch, another thing Creighton did extremely well against Nova.

This play allowed JVP to follow Wragge into the corner and bring Chef 1v1 with McDermott. High IQ opportunity for Douggy and he sunk one from 25 feet or so. Properly planned.

Example 4 of poor pick-and-roll defense:

Creighton7

First off, Grant Gibbs should never dunk on your team. It's like Peyton Manning running in a touchdown. It stings in every way.

Either way, during this play, Gibbs used a designed screen on the strong side from Wragge (again) and he had Arch trailing him. Arch got caught in the screen and then had to move around McDermott to catch a very slow Gibbs. This caused Bell and Hilliard to leave their spots on the perimeter to stop Gibbs. Bad choice.

Even though this didn't happen, Gibbs could have kicked the ball out to either corner - specifically the weak side corner to who I'll assume was Avery Dingman - and had a better shot selection. But really nothing is more high percentage than a dunk. And that's what Gibbs got while three Nova defenders couldn't stop him.

It all started with the pick-and-roll on Sunday, a scheme that was used probably the best against Villanova all season.

Defending Dribble Drive Penetration & Adjusting to Mismatches

If you know anything about Villanova basketball, you should know that the guards can't defend well in the high post or coming off terrific ball movement. That being said, their defensive rotations were tumultuous on Sunday night in Omaha. Creighton had some very quick guards which made using the dribble drive a very smart move.

Example 1 of poor reaction to the dribble drive:

Creighton4

Three. Count em', three, defenders were staring Devin Brooks in his grill. This may be the best example of Bell's defense from Sunday. He face-guarded Brooks almost 17 feet from the basket and had a wide enough frame that he should have been able to stop him.

Instead Hilliard stepped forward for a split second allowing Brooks to use a double-cross move and take Bell to the rim and finish using his left hand. Good defense from Bell, better offense from Brooks.

Example 1 of a mismatch, example 5 of poor pick-and-roll defense:

Creighton5

1) Arch is here because he got caught on a screen and was left guarding Will Artino. 2) Arch just put his hands up instead of focusing on sliding defensively. 3) All Artino had to do was switch hands and he had an easy lay-in.

Arch (6-3, 195) vs. Artino (6-11, 230, 7-5 wingspan). Advantage Creighton.

Example 2 of poor reaction to the dribble drive:

Creighton6

Bell is to blame for the breakdown of this play.

Chatman cuts into the lane being shadow-guarded by Ennis. Ennis was riding his hip and would have forced him into a difficult shot. Bell decided to step into the lane and provide help defense. The last thing you do when a player is riding someone's hip defensively is come from the strong side to provide help. Give up a two, not a three.

This opens up dribble drive penetration. Chatman draws two defenders, kicks out to the man on the wing. High IQ shot selection. Easy play. Middle school basketball.

Example 3 of poor reaction to the dribble drive:

Creighton10

Two defenders are watching Chatman move into the lane after an excellent pass from a Creighton player out of screen. The last possible defender to stop him is JVP. Pinkston also reacted late just like Arch and Jenkins and finishes with his left hand after faking right.

Better offense, poor reaction by the defense. And to be clear, when JVP leaves his position, Chatman could have swung the ball to the strong side perimeter or dumped it off to what would have been a wide open McDermott, but again, another example of a better shot under the basket than twenty feet away from it.

Example 4 of poor reaction to the dribble drive:

Remember this play from the first game in January?

Screen_shot_2014-01-21_at_4

McDermott drew five defenders to the post area leaving Wragge for a three on the strong side of the wing. A horrible breakdown defensively. That can't happen again in that exact same way in the exact same spot hundreds of miles away right?

Wrong.

Creighton9

Every single Wildcat on the floor collapses to the ball as soon as McDermott touches it and puts two dribbles on the floor. He had four teammates (one out of screen) to pass to and they could have tested the wind with their opposite hand before putting up a shot.

Wragge eventually got the pass to the weak side and sank the bucket. But this is ridiculous that McDermott could have this much presence around the rim that every player jumps to his position. Horrendous defensive effort. Douggy must be wearing that new Axe.

Example 2 of a mismatch:

Now I know a lot of Villanova fans were complaining about the no-calls on what some screens Creighton used being called "moving." Well hopefully this is a consolation to some of the home court bias that McDermott may have been getting. I won't say every screen was moving though.

Creighton8

Bell took one under the chin. A hard one.

Of course that's hard to see for fans and to get a no call is bad in this situation. All that aside, this is still basketball, players have to play to the whistle and not expect everything to be called. Especially when away from home.

I still consider this a mismatch because Bell is too slow to stop McDermott and not lengthy enough to block his line of sight to the basket completely being two or three inches shorter than the preseason All-American. McDermott works bell to about 12-feet in and uses his turnaround Dirk-esque step back, one-legged jumper over top of Bell. Filthy move. Bell just wasn't good enough defensively to guard McDermott. Hilliard would have been a smarter choice, not saying the results would have been any better though. Hypothetical at best.

Leave your opinion or your grades in the comments below.

X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

Join VU Hoops

You must be a member of VU Hoops to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at VU Hoops. You should read them.

Join VU Hoops

You must be a member of VU Hoops to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at VU Hoops. You should read them.

Spinner.vc97ec6e

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.

tracking_pixel_9347_tracker